Fast conformance tests

, ,
1

Imported from previous forum

2

Are there any known Fast Version 1.1 standard conformance tests that are openly available? I am imagining something that has a template (or templates), a bunch of binary test files (covering all the different cases of operators, mandatory/optional, present/present but null/not present, assigned/undefined/empty previous values, initial values, etc), and the expected output from decoding that binary data.

BTW, I think that such a thing would help not only developers of FAST decoders, but also would provide the canonical specification of the standard.

Thanks,

Jim Walker
RGM Advisors, LLC

3

I’m afraid not, but I agree that it would be useful.

/David

Are there any known Fast Version 1.1 standard conformance tests that are openly available? I am imagining something that has a template (or templates), a bunch of binary test files (covering all the different cases of operators, mandatory/optional, present/present but null/not present, assigned/undefined/empty previous values, initial values, etc), and the expected output from decoding that binary data.

BTW, I think that such a thing would help not only developers of FAST decoders, but also would provide the canonical specification of the standard.

Thanks,

Jim Walker
RGM Advisors, LLC

4

FIX Protocol provides the FAST Testing Portal built by Lasalletech - which is freely available and provides interoperability and conformance testing up through 1.1. http://fast.fixprotocol.org/

If you have problems or questions please let us know.

I’m afraid not, but I agree that it would be useful.

/David

Are there any known Fast Version 1.1 standard conformance tests that are openly available? I am imagining something that has a template (or templates), a bunch of binary test files (covering all the different cases of operators, mandatory/optional, present/present but null/not present, assigned/undefined/empty previous values, initial values, etc), and the expected output from decoding that binary data.

BTW, I think that such a thing would help not only developers of FAST decoders, but also would provide the canonical specification of the standard.

Thanks,

Jim Walker
RGM Advisors, LLC