Imported from previous forum
[ original email was from Zoltan Vekony - zoltan.vekony@web.de ]
Hello,
I’m currently studying the FAST 1.2 extension proposal, and have the following questions:
1.) The type definition - according to the proposal document - “accepts the normal type elements without the name attribute”. Is it correct, that only the name attribute is missing in the definition? For example, can I specify the presence or the id attribute also in the definition section?
e.g. can I define the type for the decimal field
like this?
and if I use the type definition MDEntryPxType in the template, what happens with the presence attribute?
The last occurence of the presence attribute is located according to the xml-hierarchy in the type definition of MDEntryPxType. Does it mean, that the mandatory presence attribute assigned directly to the field MDEntryPx will be ignored?
2.) Another question: Is the following usage of the field definition correct (using the same type definition with different fast operator)?
in template t1:
in template t2:
in template t3:
Thanks,
Zoltan Vekony