# MiFID II: Use of tag 20073 when OrdCapacity is Match

**URL:** <https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifid-ii-use-of-tag-20073-when-ordcapacity-is-match/213>\
**Category:** General Q&A\
**Tags:** mifidii\
**Created:** [September 5, 2017, 10:56am UTC](https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifid-ii-use-of-tag-20073-when-ordcapacity-is-match/213 "2017-09-05T10:56:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cfeargs](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/919ad9/32.png) [@cfeargs](https://forum.fixtrading.org/u/cfeargs)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2017, 10:56am UTC](https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifid-ii-use-of-tag-20073-when-ordcapacity-is-match/213/1 "2017-09-05T10:56:39Z")

</div>

When sending an execution report under match capacity, 29=3, and including the reportable information in tag 20073 should that be the MIC code of the reporting venue, or is XOFF sufficient.

In the transaction reporting guidelines TransReporting\_1.3\_22Jun17 it states XOFF in the examples, we have seen some client specifications that are stating that the operating MIC of the venue should be present.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![varun.a.das](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/74df32/32.png) [@varun.a.das](https://forum.fixtrading.org/u/varun.a.das)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2017, 7:57pm UTC](https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifid-ii-use-of-tag-20073-when-ordcapacity-is-match/213/2 "2017-09-06T19:57:50Z")

</div>

Segment MIC of Venue is only applicable for below cases:

- Negotiated trade (traded off book but under rules of Trading Venue) between Broker and Client is brought by the Broker who is a member on the Trading Venue
- Agency Broker crossing two client orders brings the cross on a Trading Venue under a Waiver.

For Trading Capacity of MTCH, it will be XOFF as Client is not facing the Trading Venue.