# MiFIDII. Exec Venue. Proposed PartyRole 452=73

**URL:** https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifidii-exec-venue-proposed-partyrole-452-73/197
**Category:** General Q&A
**Tags:** mifidii
**Created:** [August 22, 2017, 4:10pm UTC](https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifidii-exec-venue-proposed-partyrole-452-73/197 "2017-08-22T16:10:19Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![vanessarobson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/ba8739/32.png) [@vanessarobson](https://forum.fixtrading.org/u/vanessarobson)
#### Post date: [August 22, 2017, 4:10pm UTC](https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifidii-exec-venue-proposed-partyrole-452-73/197/1 "2017-08-22T16:10:19Z")

</div>

Is there any update on whether Transaction and Trade Reporting spec recommendation to use 452=73 will be in place for Jan 2018? I do not see 452 value 73 in FIXimate for tag 452.

Thanks

• NoPartyIds 453=1  
• PartyID 448=XOFF  
• PartyIDSource 447=G (MIC)  
• PartyIDRole 452=73 (execution venue)  
Firms unable to use repeating groups can instead

Proposal to add new value for tag 452 = 73 is in Trade and Transaction Reporting spec. Dated April 2017. Status Draft.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![vanessarobson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/ba8739/32.png) [@vanessarobson](https://forum.fixtrading.org/u/vanessarobson)
#### Post date: [August 22, 2017, 4:17pm UTC](https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifidii-exec-venue-proposed-partyrole-452-73/197/2 "2017-08-22T16:17:29Z")

</div>

Same question for new value PartyIDSource: 447=N for reporting LEI of Broker and client counterparties.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hanno.klein](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex010/user_avatar/forum.fixtrading.org/hanno.klein/32/38_2.png) [@hanno.klein](https://forum.fixtrading.org/u/hanno.klein)
#### Post date: [August 23, 2017, 7:25am UTC](https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifidii-exec-venue-proposed-partyrole-452-73/197/3 "2017-08-23T07:25:20Z")

</div>

There must be a misunderstanding. 452=73 is part of the FIX standard as of FIX 5.0, i.e. since more than 10 years. Please post a link to your source of information which is likely to be outdated. 447=N is much more recent and was added in the context of MiFID II and was added with EP156 ([https://www.fixtrading.org/packages/ep156/](https://www.fixtrading.org/packages/ep156/)) called “Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Extension”.

The FIX regulatory working groups are working closely together with the FIX Global Technical Committee to make extensions available. Please check the list of Extension Packs ([https://www.fixtrading.org/extension-packs/](https://www.fixtrading.org/extension-packs/)).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![vanessarobson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/ba8739/32.png) [@vanessarobson](https://forum.fixtrading.org/u/vanessarobson)
#### Post date: [August 23, 2017, 1:14pm UTC](https://forum.fixtrading.org/t/mifidii-exec-venue-proposed-partyrole-452-73/197/4 "2017-08-23T13:14:36Z")

</div>

Thanks Hanno. It is my misunderstanding. We are using FIX 4.4 for the AK message and I only checked the message definitions for FIX 4.4. Legacy FIX and the values didn’t show there. Appreciate the clarification.