Imported from previous forum
[ original email was from Mikael Brannstrom - m.brannstrom@ngm.se ]
I’ve noticed that the wrong enum values are used for TradeHandlingInstr in “Trade Handling Usage Tables […]” (pages 179-202) in appendix B in Volume 5 of the spec.
In the “Trade Handling Instr” column it says “One-Party Report for Pass-Thru (1)” and “One-Party Report for Matching (2)” etc while FIXimate and vol 6 says:
TradeHandlingInstr (1123):
0=Trade Confirmation
1=Two-Party Report
2=One-Party Report for Matching
3=One-Party Report for Pass Through
4=Automated Floor Order Routing
5=Two Party Report for Claim
/Mikael