The 81 value of 452(PartyRole) in fiximate is as below. Don’t know if the “cient” is a typo?
Broker cient ID Added EP68 Updated EP223 [BrokerClearingID]
Also, why “BrokerClearingID” not quite match the “Broker cient ID” ?
This has been fixed in EP271, publication will be early next week. See here for details.
@hanno.klein, Just curious - I was thought it is “Broker Client ID” as some sites states 81=Broker Client ID. Or Broker Clearing ID and “Broker clearing identifier” are the same?
@robertlau, unfortunately this happens when people copy content from the FIX website and make changes without checking with FIX, e.g. through this forum (as you are doing 
). The website you are referring to has also copied text from the appendix 6-G of the FIX legacy specification and provides a link to it. If you follow that link you will see:
It is the identifier of the broker used for clearing purposes. It is not the identifier for a client of a broker. The latter is covered by PartyRole(452)=3 (Client ID).
For the record: The original submission for this value to be added states that it is “broker clearing ID” NOT “broker client ID”.
Thanks @hanno.klein, @ltaikit. Got it.